Bericon Forensics provides independent drug driving expert witness reports for criminal defence solicitors throughout England and Wales.
Our experienced forensic experts examine blood and urine results, prosecution toxicology evidence and accounts of drug use. We provide clear scientific opinions on the interpretation and significance of the evidence in proceedings under sections 4 and 5A of the Road Traffic Act 1988. Our reports are prepared for use in the Magistrates’ Court and Crown Court and can be completed within urgent court timescales where possible.
Latest blog Drug Driving Overtakes Drink Driving
Our forensic toxicology experts interpret concentrations of controlled drugs and their metabolites in blood. We can explain what the result shows, what it does not show and how it should be interpreted within the circumstances of the case.
A defendant may provide information about the amount of a drug used, the time of use and the method of administration. Our drug driving expert witnesses can assess whether that account is scientifically consistent with the analytical findings.
Where appropriate, we can consider whether:
Any limitations in the available scientific evidence will be clearly explained.
Our forensic experts can review the prosecution laboratory report and supporting case papers.
This may include consideration of:
Where necessary, we can advise whether additional laboratory documentation or unused material should be requested.
Section 5A of the Road Traffic Act 1988 concerns driving, attempting to drive or being in charge of a vehicle with a specified controlled drug above the prescribed limit.
In these cases, the prosecution generally relies on the concentration of the specified drug measured in a blood sample. It is not normally necessary to establish that the driver showed visible signs of impairment.
Our drug driving experts can review the analytical result and the surrounding scientific evidence. This may include considering the reliability and interpretation of the reported drug concentration, the timing and amount of drug use, post-driving consumption, prescribed or medical use, and whether an account of drug use is scientifically consistent with the analytical findings.
Section 4 cases concern whether a person’s ability to drive was impaired through drink or drugs.
Our forensic drug experts can consider the toxicology findings alongside other relevant evidence, which may include observations of driving, police evidence, field impairment tests, medical examinations and the reported circumstances of drug use.
Where a drug has been detected, an expert can consider whether the substance and reported concentration could have contributed to impairment. The evidence must be considered as a whole, as the presence of a drug does not, on its own, establish the extent of any impairment.
The prescribed drug driving limits include several medicines that may be lawfully supplied for medical or dental treatment. This may include prescribed controlled drugs and medical cannabis. A statutory medical defence may be relevant where a specified controlled drug was prescribed or supplied for medical or dental purposes and was taken in accordance with the directions provided.
Our drug driving experts can examine:
Where medical cannabis is involved, our experts can consider the prescribed product, dosage and pattern of use alongside the reported THC concentration and other relevant scientific evidence.
The availability of any legal defence is a matter for the court. Our role is to provide an independent scientific opinion on the toxicology evidence.
To provide an initial opinion or quotation, it is helpful to send us the available case papers. Depending on the issues in the case, these may include:
It is not necessary to have every document available before contacting us. We can advise at an early stage whether expert evidence is likely to assist and whether any additional documentation should be obtained.
Bericon Forensics works primarily with criminal defence solicitors and barristers.
Our reports are:
We understand the pressures created by court directions, funding requirements and late service of prosecution evidence. Our team aims to provide responsive assistance from initial instruction through to the witness box.
A drug driving expert witness examines scientific evidence in a criminal case and provides an independent opinion for the court. This may include interpreting blood drug results, reviewing laboratory evidence and assessing whether an account of drug use is consistent with the findings.
A result can be reviewed to determine whether the analysis, reporting and interpretation are scientifically reliable. The fact that a result exceeds a legal limit does not prevent a forensic expert from examining how the sample was obtained, analysed and interpreted.
It is sometimes possible to discuss whether a concentration may have been higher or lower at an earlier time. However, precise back-calculation is often unreliable for drugs because absorption and elimination vary considerably between individuals. Any scientifically valid conclusions and limitations will be explained in the report.
A positive result proves that the laboratory detected the reported substance, subject to the reliability of the analysis. It does not necessarily establish the exact degree of impairment.
For section 5A cases, the central issue is usually whether the concentration exceeded the prescribed limit. For section 4 cases, the court considers whether the person was unfit to drive.
Yes. Our forensic experts regularly examine THC, carboxy-THC and other cannabinoid findings. We can consider the concentration, reported time of use, sampling time, pattern of cannabis use and whether the account is consistent with the result.
Yes. We can interpret cocaine and benzoylecgonine concentrations and consider the possible timing and pattern of use. The relationship between the parent drug and its metabolites may provide useful information, although conclusions depend on the circumstances and available evidence.
Yes. We regularly work with criminal defence solicitors in legally aided cases and can provide quotations suitable for prior-authority applications